
Selection
of radial artery for use as aortocoronary graft: preoperative assessment
with Doppler ultrasound and digital photoplethysmography and surgical
confirmation
(Portuguese
PDF version)
Fanilda
Souto Barros1, Sandra Maria Pontes1,
Maria Alice Almeida Taylor2, Leonard Roelke Hermann3,
Melchior Luiz Lima4
1.
Vascular ultrasonographer. Angiolab - Laboratório de Diagnóstico
Vascular, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
2. Surgeon and Vascular ultrasonographer. Angiolab - Laboratório
de Diagnóstico Vascular, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
3. Surgeon and Vascular ultrasonographer. Professor of Angiology
and Vascular Surgery, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
(UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.
4. Cardiac surgeon, Universidade Federal do Espírito
Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Correspondence:
Fanilda Souto Barros
Angiolab - Laboratório Vascular
Rua José Teixeira, 290
CEP 29055-310 - Vitória, ES
Brazil
E-mail: fanilda@bol.com.br
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
With the increasing use of the radial artery as aortocoronary graft,
it has become necessary to reevaluate the criteria used for preoperative
selection of this vessel in myocardial revascularization surgery.
The aim of this study was to employ the perioperative assessment
performed by the cardiac surgeon to confirm the viability of the
selected radial artery through two noninvasive methods: color Doppler
ultrasound and digital photoplethysmography.
Methods: Between July 1998 and January 2000, 78 radial arteries
and 78 ulnar arteries of 39 patients candidates for myocardial revascularization
surgery were studied. The study was performed bilaterally using
an ATL HDI 5000 ultrasound machine and a Parks Vascular Mini-Lab
Model 1052-C. The radial artery was considered suitable to be used
as aortocoronary graft when it fulfilled the following criteria:
absence of atheromatosis or occlusion of the ipsilateral radial
and ulnar arteries; internal diameter of the radial artery >
2.5 mm, assessed by color Doppler ultrasound; and presence of pulse
wave in two or more digits during radial compression, assessed by
photoplethysmography. The results of the exams were confirmed by
the perioperative evaluation of the radial arteries.
Results: Of the 78 radial arteries studied, 66 (84.6%) were
considered suitable to be used as a graft whereas 12 (15.4%) were
considered unsuitable. Among the 39 patients studied, 24 (61.5%)
underwent myocardial revascularization surgery with the use of the
radial artery. The viability of the radial artery was evaluated
perioperatively in all cases and confirmed preoperative findings
determined by color Doppler ultrasound and photoplethysmography
used to select the artery.
Conclusion: The authors conclude that the use of noninvasive
tests - color Doppler ultrasound and photoplethysmography - to select
radial artery for aortocoronary grafts is effective as confirmed
by perioperative findings. The association of these two methods
provides greater safety and a better surgical planning for each
patient.
Key-words:
radial artery, grafts, color Doppler ultrasound, photoplethysmography.
Palavras-chave: artéria radial, enxertos, ecocardiografia
Doppler em cores, fotopletismografia.
J
Vasc Br 2004;3(2):107-10
During
many years, the internal saphenous vein was the best choice as an arterial
substitute. First described by Favarolo et al.1
and still used by many cardiovascular surgeons in cases of obstructive
atherosclerotic disease, the internal saphenous vein, however, is not
the only alternative, perhaps not even the better. Later, the use of
mammary artery (internal thoracic) with the same purpose was proposed
by Kolessov et al.2
Carpentier et al.3 were the pioneers in
employing the radial artery as a vascular substitutive in myocardial
revascularization surgery. Initially, this technique presented bad results
due to the spasm that is peculiar to this vessel. Years later, changes
were introduced on the surgical technique, as well the association of
drugs like calcium channel blockers, with the aim at reducing the incidence
of vasospasms.4 These changes stimulated
the reactivation of the use of this artery.
The use of artery as a graft has showed to be superior to the use of
vein due to its similarity in caliber to the coronary, its wall composition,
and its longer patency time.
In face of the frequent usage of radial artery as aortocoronary bypass
and the excellent results showed by several authors,4,5
it has become necessary to reevaluate the criteria used in the preoperative
selection of this vessel when the objective is to study patency, diameter
size, presence or absence of atherosclerotic disease in the radial and
ulnar arteries, and assess digital perfusion through maneuvers that
simulate radial artery harvesting, avoiding, therefore, ischemic postoperative
complications, as well as providing surgeons with information regarding
the anatomic and functional state of the selected artery.
In relation to hand circulation, it is widely known that the irrigation
is predominantly performed by the superficial palmar arch, with the
ulnar artery playing the major role. The superficial palmar arch is
called complete when there is a continuity of the arch, with blood supply
coming through both radial and ulnar arteries. It is considered incomplete
when there is no connection between the terminal branches of both arteries,
in a way that, in such cases, radial artery harvesting may affect digital
perfusion. According to Coleman et al.,6,7
the arch is complete in 78.5% of the population.
The advent of color Doppler (CD), a noninvasive vascular diagnostic
technique, made possible to select which venous or arterial segment
is suitable to be used as arterial substitute.8
The aim of this work is to evaluate the efficiency and utility of radial
artery mapping with the use of CD combined with digital photoplethysmography
in patients selected for myocardial revascularization surgery, confirming,
through surgical evaluation, the findings obtained from preoperative
noninvasive methods.
MATERIAL
AND METHODS
From July
1998 to January 2000, 78 radial and 78 ulnar arteries of 39 patients
were studied. Among the 39 patients, 27 were male and 12 were female.
Age ranged from 42 to 84 years. Arterial mapping with CD, including
subclavian, brachial, radial and bilateral ulnar arteries, was performed
on ATL HDI 5000 scanner, with 7.5-Mhz linear transducers. The following
parameters were analyzed:
- investigation of atherosclerotic disease of the radial and ulnar
arteries;
- inner diameter size of the radial and ulnar arteries, obtained
through ultrasound with the vessel cut in cross-section;
- patency assessment of the vessel by color and pulsed Doppler
ultrasound.
The digital photoplethysmography was performed using a Parks vascular
Mini-Lab,model 1052-C. Pulse waves were obtained from all digits, with
patient in seated position keeping the hand relaxed, and during compression
of the radial artery
The radial
artery was considered suitable to be used as aortocoronary bypass when
it presented the following parameters:
- patency assessed by CD (Figure 1);
- absence of atheromatosis in the radial and ulnar arteries assessed
by CD;
- inner diameter of radial artery > 2.5 mm (Figure 2);
- photoplethysmography showing the presence of pulse wave in all
digits during compression of the ipsilateral radial artery.
Figure
1 - Radial artery patency showed by color Doppler.

Figure
2 - Radial artery diameter.

The parameters
evaluated by the cardiac surgery team were direct visibility of the
artery and caliber measurement of the vessel, using ogives of 1.5 mm
and 3.0 mm diameter. These data were used to confirm the description
of the ultrasonographic findings.
The maneuver employed by the vascular surgeon to evaluate the integrity
of the superficial palmar arch and later correlation with the photoplethysmography
consisted of a small incision in the radial artery for detection of
retrograde flow that, when present, reassured that the digital circulation
would be maintained after the radial artery harvesting.
RESULTS
Among the
78 arteries studied in 39 patients, 66 (84.6%) were considered suitable
and feasible for harvesting for further use as aortocoronary graft.
Of the 66 radial arteries considered suitable in 32 patients, 24 were
used as aortocoronary bypass. There was no disagreement between the
preoperative assessment obtained through the noninvasive methods and
the perioperative findings.
Twelve arteries (15.4%) were considered unsuitable.
Contra-indications for radial artery harvesting were due to the presence
of atherosclerotic disease in the radial artery, showed by CD ultrasound,
in two cases; the presence of atherosclerotic disease of the ulnar artery
in three cases; brachial artery occlusion, showed by CD ultrasound in
two cases; absence or decrease of pulse wave in at least two digits
during compression of the ipsilateral radial artery, evaluated by photoplethysmography
in five arteries, although CD evaluation showed normal radial and ulnar
arteries, therefore, suggesting the presence of incomplete superficial
palmar arch.
In three patients, the photoplethysmography could not be performed.
In these cases, the mapping of the radial and ulnar artery with CD was
sufficient to select the radial artery for aortocoronary bypass. The
perioperative finding was in accordance with the CD result.
None of the patients showed postoperative ischemic phenomena.
COMMENTS
Considering
the increasing use of the radial artery as aortocoronary graft, the
technological progress of noninvasive methods for assessment and selection
of vascular substitutive, the preoperative mapping of the internal saphenous
vein with CD,9 and the satisfactory results
obtained from previous studies develop by our vascular team in association
with cardiovascular surgeons, we decided to follow the same line of
reasoning, that is, the correlation between the findings of radial artery
preoperative selection by CD and photoplethysmography with perioperative
assessment of the viability of this vessel to be used as a graft.
The radial artery mapping using CD in combination with digital photoplethysmography
has showed to be very useful for radial artery preoperative selection
in myocardial revascularization surgery. The CD provides information
about the anatomic state of the artery whereas the photoplethysmography
allows an indirect evaluation of digital perfusion during compression
of the radial artery, simulating its harvesting.
Aiming at selecting the radial artery for aortocoronary bypass, Kupinski
et al.,10 using CD and photoplethysmography,
evaluated 146 patients before they underwent myocardial revascularization
surgery. In 22 patients, the radial artery was not used due to abnormalities
that were showed by the CD, by the photoplethysmography, or by both.
The radial artery of 24 (61.5%) patients, out of 39, was used as aortocoronary
graft. Contraindication for harvesting 12 (15.4%) radial arteries, due
to bilateral involvement of the arteries, lead to changes in the surgical
planning of two patients.
During one month postoperatively, all patients were interviewed. There
was no complaint about the presence of ischemic phenomena.
Perioperative evaluation of the quality and viability of use of the
radial artery considered suitable by noninvasive preoperative assessment
was confirmed in all cases.
The preoperative assessment of the patient selected to undergo myocardial
revascularization surgery, using noninvasive methodology, offers safe
and reliable information regarding the arterial or venous segment to
be used as a graft. It also allows a more efficient surgical planning,
since it is possible to foresee the available options and the best choice
for the patient, avoiding, therefore, unnecessary incisions in search
of veins and arteries, increased surgical time, as well as postoperative
complications.
CONCLUSION
The authors
conclude that the selection of the radial artery for use as aortocoronary
graft, assessed by two noninvasive tests - CD and photoplethysmography
- has proved to be efficient, since the viability of the radial artery,
selected through the combination of these two methods, was confirmed
by perioperative evaluation. Having previous information on the viability
of the radial artery for use as arterial substitute provides greater
safety and better surgical planning for each patient.
REFERENCES
1.
Favarolo RG. Saphenous vein graft in the surgical treatment of coronary
artery disease: operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;58:178-85.
2. Kolessov VI. Mammary artery-coronary anastomosis
as a method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1967;54:535-44.
3. Carpenteer A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A, Frechette
C, DuBost C. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft. Ann Thorac
Surg 1973;16:111-21.
4. Manasse E, Sperti, Suma H, et al. Use of the radial
artery for myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1076-83.
5. Costa F, Costa I, Poffo R, et al. Myocardial revascularization
with the radial artery: a clinical and angiographic study. Ann Thorac
Surg 1996;62:745-80.
6. Dean RH, Yao J, Brewster D. Current diagnosis and
treatment in vascular surgery. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies;
1995. p. 155-157.
7. Winkler J, Lohr J, Heam A. Evaluation of the radial
artery for use in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Vasc Tech 1998;22:23-9.
8. Cousens KA, Altemus AP, Musson AM, Zwoulak RM. Utility
of preoperative vein mapping. J Vasc Technol 1997;21:227-31.
9. Barros F, Pontes S, Lima M, et al. Mapeamento da
safena interna com ecocolor Doppler no pré-operatório
de cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica. Rev
Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1999;14:303-7.
10. Kupinski A, Huang J, Khan A, et al. Noninvasive
upper extremity arterial. J Vasc Technol 1998;22:187-91.
|