
Chronic
venous insufficiency. An update
(Portuguese
PDF version)
Luís
Henrique Gil França1, Viviane Tavares2
1.
Vascular
surgeon, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Curitiba. Post-graduate
in Surgical Clinic, Universidade Federal do Paraná.
2. Physical therapist. Specialist in Trauma Orthopedics and Pilate
Methods.
Correspondence:
Dr. Luís Henrique Gil França
Rua Coronel Dulcídio, 1189/1801
CEP 80250-100 - Curitiba - PR
Brazil
Phone: +55 (41) 343.0963
E-mail: luishgf@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
Chronic
venous insufficiency is an extremely relevant disease, attacking
people of different ages, and it is associated with socio-economical
problems like absence from work and even the early retirement of
young people still in a productive phase of life. This disease has
an elevated incidence and prevalence, including its association
with varicose veins, ulcers and trophic lesions. The diagnosis is
clinical, and when necessary, additional tests are used such as
photoplethysmography, duplex-scan and phlebogram. Treatment involves
bandages or elastic stockings, specific dressings and surgical procedures.
The purpose of this article is to create a current review of the
evaluation and management of chronic venous insufficiency.
Key
words: venous disease, chronic venous insufficiency, venous
ulcer.
Palavras-chave: insuficiência venosa, úlcera
venosa, diagnóstico.
J
Vasc Br 2003;2(4):318-28
Chronic
venous insufficiency is a common disease in clinical practice, and its
complications, principally venous stasis ulcer, cause significant morbidity.
The ulceration affects work productivity, causing retirement due to
disability in addition to restricting daily life and leisure activities.
For many patients, venous disease causes pain, loss of functional mobility
and a decreased quality of life.
In Brazil, the social importance of chronic vein insufficiency (CVI)
has come to the attention of the government only during recent years,
creating an increased interest in gaining scientific knowledge of the
questions related to this disease.1
DEFINITION
Chronic
venous insufficiency is defined as the functional abnormality of the
venous system caused by valvular incompetence that may or may not be
associated with the obstruction of the venous flow. It can affect the
surface venous system, the deep venous system, or both. In addition,
venous dysfunction can be the result of a congenital disorder or may
be acquired.2
EPIDEMIOLOGY
The prevalence
of CVI in the population increases with age. In Europe, 5 to 15% of
adults between the ages of 30 and 70 present this disease, being that
1% present a varicose ulcer. In the United States, approximately 7 million
people suffer from CVI, which causes 70 to 90% of all lower limb ulcers.3,4
In an epidemiological study on lower limb venous alterations among the
population of Botucatu, São Paulo, Maffei et al.,5
estimated a 35.5% prevalence of varicose veins and serious cases of
CVI with an open or healed ulcer in 1.5% of these cases.
Silva, 6 who studied the socio-economic
repercussions of CVI, analyzed the 1984 study published by the Social
Security Minister that described the incidence, in descending order
of frequency, of the 50 principal causes of diseases that provoked temporary
work leave of individuals covered by the Brazilian nationalized social
security system as well as the benefits paid as a consequence. The year
of reference was 1983, when CVI occupied 14th place. In spite of its
high incidence, the author concluded that these numbers do not entirely
reflect the Brazilian reality, as more data would be necessary for a
concrete conclusion of the problem and its cost for the economy of the
nation.6
On his study on the risk factors, Scott et al. 7
demonstrated that 50% of patients had a history of trauma in the lower
affected limb (2.4% risk of CVI development). In addition, he discovered
that 45% of patients presented a history of thrombophlebitis (25.7%
risk of CVI development) and that a family history of varicose or CVI
(suggesting a genetic component), is also associated with an increase
of incidence.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The venous
system is a capacitating system that functions as a blood reservoir
and that has the function of carrying deoxygenated blood back to the
heart. The calf veins, in association with the surrounding tissues,
form a functional unit known as the muscular pump of the peripheral
heart, which actively works to drain venous blood during excercise.8
Traditionally, CVI has been grouped into four clinical forms: primary
or essential varicose veins, postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), varicose
veins due to congenital angioplasties (Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome, Parkes-Weber
Syndrome, Bockenheimer Syndrome) and varicose veins due to acquired
arterial-venous fistulas. It is recognized today that varicose veins
caused by pregnancy also constitute a separate group, with its own etiopathogenic
and pathophysiological characteristics.1
There are two mechanisms for venous hypertension. The first is hydrostatic
pressure, related to the pressure of the blood column of the right atrium.
In normal situations, the venous flow travels from the surface to deep
venous system through communicating veins with competent valves that
impede the blood from returning to the surface veins. The incompetence
of deep venous system and communicating valves and the resulting reflux
is the cause of venous hypertension.8
Venous obstruction in patients that had deep venous thrombosis tends
to recanalize in a period of three to six months. After this process,
a lesion is caused by venous valve cusp from the thrombotic process,
consequently causing venous reflux. With the presence of the reflux
at the beginning of the condition, the calf musculature tries to compensate
the volume of the insufficient veins, injecting a higher volume of blood.
With the aggravation of the reflux, the pump becomes insufficient, causing
a cyclical reduction of pressure from 100 mmHg to levels of between
0 and 30 mmHg. Such a process causes the onset of permanent chronic
venous hypertension, initiating the symptoms of CVI.8
The second mechanism is dynamic and is related to the calf musculature
that exercises an important role in venous return. This muscular pump,
when it functions perfectly, compresses the deep veins of the calf when
it contracts (the largest reservoirs of this system are sinusoidal capillaries
of gastrocnemius and soleus muscles). The distal valve of the deep vein
and the valves of the perforating veins close and blood is ejected toward
the heart. During calf relaxation, a huge reduction of pressure occurs
in the deep veins and negative pressures can build, thus resulting in
the closure of the proximal valve of the deep axis. In this way, the
venous pressure of the superficial network is more elevated than of
the deep axes, and the blood is deeply aspirated through the perforating
veins. Through an aspirating and compressive action, the hydrostatic
venous pressure of an individual is reduced from 100 mmHg to 0-30 mmHg
during walking. The muscle pump in healthy individuals ejects blood
in such an effective way that is reduces intravascular venous pressure
to values close to zero. It may also raise this pressure to values above
200 mmHg. To make this muscle pump work properly the following are necessary:
good draining pervious veins with competent valves, eutonic and eutrophic
musculature, neural integrity and free joints. The dysfunction of the
calf muscle, whether or not it is associated with valvular dysfunction,
is also responsible for venous hypertension, carrying an excessive accumulation
of liquid and fibrinogen in the subcutaneous tissue, resulting in edema,
lipodermatosclerosis and finally, ulceration.8
Venous pressure remains elevated in the lower limbs during walking,
when in normal conditions it should decrease. In this way, the adjacent
tissues are continuously exposed to an elevated venous pressure while
the patient remains with his/her legs downward. There is still no explanation
for why this elevated pressure leads to the formation of ulcers in the
lower limbs. Edema secondary to hypertension could be one of the factors.
Still, patients with cardiac insufficiency and/or hepatic congestion
with edema of the lower limbs do not develop the skin alterations and
ulcers characteristic of patients with chronic venous insufficiency.9
Two theories attempt to explain these changes that occur in patients
with CVI. The first explains that elevated venous pressure leads to
an increase capillary bed size and the enlargement of interstitial pores,
permitting excess drainage of the fibrinogen through the pores, which
then polymerizes in fibrin. The deposit of fibrin leads to the formation
of sleeves that interfere with the diffusion of oxygen and nutrients,
predisposing patients to the formation of ulcers.10,11
The second theory affirms that the leukocytes are kidnapped at the endothelial
wall of the capillary bed exposed to elevated venous pressure. The leukocytes
then enter into contact with intracellular adhesion molecules in the
capillary wall. The cells are activated, and cytokines and free radicals
are liberated into the venous bed, causing an inflammatory reaction
with a lesion of venous valves and of the adjacent tissue, thus predisposing
the individual to ulceration.
DIAGNOSIS
The diagnosis
of chronic venous insufficiency is imminently clinical through anamnesis
and physical examination. The items to be considered in the anamnesis
are the complaint and duration of symptoms, including: the history of
current illness; the characterization of previous diseases (especially
venous thrombosis); previous traumatisms of the limbs and the existence
of varicose disease. The symptoms include a sensation of weightiness
and pain in the lower limbs, principally in the evenings, and some patients
complain of associated itching. In the physical examination, the following
should be observed: hyperpigmentation (the hemoglobin that is found
in the interior tissue is transformed into hemosiderin, which causes
brown spots on the skin), lipodermatosclerosis (alteration due to the
progressive substitution of the skin and subcutaneous tissue by fibrosis),
pitting edema (greater in the symptomatic leg), the presence of varicose
veins, the presence of nevi, the increase in length of the limb and
the atypically located varicose veins. The examination should always
be performed under good lighting, with the patient in a standing position
after a few minutes of orthostatism.14,15
The chronic venous stasis ulcer begins spontaneously or traumatically,
can have a variable size and depth and cures and reoccurrences are frequent.
For primary varicose veins, the ulcer only causes pain when infected.
In the after-effect of venous thrombosis, the lesion is usually more
painful. Stasis ulcers generally appear on the medial face of the leg,
near the medial anklebone. These ulcers have the following characteristics:
irregular, flat borders with a red base and serohematic or seropurulent
exudate and pigmentation around the outside edge. They are generally
not painful, except for when infected.14,16
CVI evaluation presents a greater degree of complexity than the arterial
disease evaluation. The different diagnostic methods for venous disease
are dependent examinations and require specific clinical skill.16
CLASSIFICATION
Widmer
proposed the first CVI classification.17
However, it did not specify the nature of stage I, nor did it specify
the differentiation between the trophic alterations in stage II. The
classification was as follows:
" Class I - edema, lateral phlebectasia of the feet (corona phlebectatica
paraplantaris).
" Class II - trophic alterations (hyperpigmentation and lipodermatosclerosis).
" Class III - open or healed ulcer.
Later,
Porter's classification arose, with the following categories:
" Class 0 - Asymptomatic.
" Class 1 - Mild CVI. Moderate edema, discrete pain and local or
generalized dilatation of subcutaneous veins.
" Class 2 - Moderate CVI. Moderate to severe edema, varicose veins,
strong pain, hyperpigmentation and lipodermatosclerosis.
" Class 3 - Severe CVI. Severe edema, large-caliber varicose veins,
accentuated trophic abnormalities and ulcer.
Due to
the necessity for more specificity and uniformity in the evaluation
of venous disease, the CEAP (clinical; etiology; anatomic; pathophysiology)
classification was created. This classification is the one used currently.2,18
Clinical
classification (C):
" Class 0 - Without visible or palpable signs of venous disease.
" Class 1 - Telangiectasias and/or reticular veins.
" Class 2 - Varicose veins.
" Class 3 - Edema.
" Class 4 - Alterations of the skin (hyperpigmentation, lipodermatosclerosis).
" Class 5 - Class 4 with healed ulcer.
" Class 6 - Class 4 with active ulcer.
Etiological classification (E):
" Congenital - EC.
" Primary- EP.
" Secondary - ES: post-thrombotic, post-traumatic and others.
Anatomic
classification (A):
" Superficial veins - AS.
" Deep veins - AD.
" Perforating veins - AP.
Pathophysiological
classification (P):
" Reflux - PR.
" Obstruction - PO.
" Reflux and obstruction - PR, O.
DIFFERENTIAL
DIAGNOSIS
Venous
edema, and occasionally cardiac insufficiency, produces hyperpigmentation
due to the fragmenting of overflowing erythrocytes. However only venous
edema progresses into subcutaneous fibrosis and cutaneous atrophy in
response to the erythrocytes and plasmatic overflowing erythrocytes.
The pitting edema is typically produced by cardiac insufficiency, but
it is also present when the edema is produced by severe hypoproteinemia.17
Edema due to cardiac insufficiency, similar to venous edema, can be
relieved by elevating the extremity, and it is known to disappear at
night. However, in the first case, liquid mobilization can produce orthopnea,
nocturnal paroxysmal dyspnea and nocturia. Cardiac edema and other orthostatic
edemas can also be evidence that the feet are being attacked, and such
a symptom never occurs with venous edema. Congestive cardiac insufficiency
frequently causes bilateral edema instead of venous edema or lymphedema.
However, it is also asymmetrical and is commonly worse on the left side.17
Lymphedema typically attacks the toes, feet, and ankles in an ascending
fashion. In the late stages of lymphedema, pigmentation can occur. However,
the skin becomes hypertrophic and the subcutaneous tissue is continuously
filled as the lymph accumulate with variable dimensions.1,17
Patients with chronic lymphedema usually develop painless swelling of
the extremity. A pitting edema is not produced or the edema is only
partially depressive. It attacks the ankle, and in the majority of patients,
the foot. The instep edema is similar to a humpback, and is characteristic
in patients with lymphedema. The squared toes, caused by the high amount
of protein in the excessive tissue liquid, also represent a characteristic
aspect. Although chronic eczematous dermatitis and skin excoriation
occur from long-term lymphedema, similarly to hyperkeratosis and lichenification
(peau d`órange), frank ulcerations are rare.1,17
A long-term edema rich in proteins is typically the center of the infection,
principally for gram-positive germs, in general beta-hemolytic streptococcus
that penetrates the skin through various excoriations, wounds, insect
bites, etc., leading to infection of the skin, of the subcutaneous cellular
tissue (cellulite) and of the vast subcutaneous lymphatic network (erysipelas).
It can spread across great extensions of the leg, with an intense pain
and hyperemia of the inflammatory process, and it is generally accompanied
by general symptoms and high fever. These cellulite and erysipelas crises
frequently worsen the clinical picture due to the increase in lymphatic
obstruction.1 The endocrine causes of edema
should also be studied. The most common of these is the edema that appears
in thyroid insufficiency and is characterized by myxedema. In addition
to the edema, other characteristics of hyperthyroidism should also be
studied, such as the full moon face, dry skin, bradylalia, hypohidrosis,
hair thinning and bradycardia.17
The cyclical edema of women is related to pre and intra-menstrual phases,
and it is caused by a defect in the renal elimination of sodium. The
lipoedema attacks the feminine sex and corresponds to an abnormal deposit
of fat in the two legs in a symmetrical fashion.17
There is not anamnesis, passed from erysipelas and/or cellulite. There
is not a thickening of the skin, ulcerations and hyperpigmentation alteration.
Other causes should be evaluated, including: gravitational; idiopathic;
hypokalemic edema; edema related to medicines; edema due to extrinsic
compression (Baker cyst, inguinal hernia, solear syndrome, gastrocnemius
veins, venous stenosis, lymphadenopathy, mole tissue tumors and pregnancy);
paraneoplasic edema.17
COMPLEMENTARY
EXAMINATION
The continuous
wave Doppler is the principal evaluation method after clinical examination,
as it can detect reflux in the saphenous-femoral or saphenous-popliteal
junction. The venous duplex scan determines the location and morphology
of the alterations, principally of the reflux involving the territory
of the greater/lesser saphenous vein; the location of the incompetent
perforating veins; diagnostic explanation of edema without other signs
of CVI; the evaluation of cases of recurring varicose veins and vascular
anomalies, the investigation of previous deep venous thrombosis, valvular
insufficiency and deep venous system reflux.15
Ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) refers to the pressure measured in
a distal vein (usually a vein from the instep) after an exercise using
the calf muscles. It is defined as venous pressure in the superficial
veins of the foot after 10 exercises with the tips of the toes in an
erect position. In normal limbs with functional valves, the venous pressure
of the foot is reduced to 20 mmHg or less due to the exercise. Afterwards,
the pressure slowly returns during a period of 20 seconds or more as
the calf veins are once again filled with the capillary influx. A high
level of correlation has been established between the increasingly higher
levels of AVP and the incidence of ulceration of the leg in patients
with CVI. The AVP is elevated in the majority of patients with CVI that
originates in either the superficial or deep venous systems. Patients
with isolated varicose veins and competent communicating veins present
a slight elevation in the AVP, whereas the patients with deep valvular
incompetence, including the popliteal and perforating vein, tend to
have higher levels of AVP. The presence of concomitant proximal deep
venous obstruction can increase levels of AVP even further. Ambulatory
venous pressure reflects the global effects of valvular incompetence,
of anterograde venous flow obstruction and of the failure of the calf
muscles. However, measuring AVP does not allow the physician to separate
the individual effect of each component that contributes to the presence
of CVI. The AVP cannot separate the different components that contribute
to the presence of CVI and continue to be within the normal limits in
a significant number of patients that develop cutaneous ulceration due
to venous stasis.19
The venous plethysmography can be used in evaluating how much the venous
function (obstruction and reflux) has been affected, estimating the
proportion of damage to the superficial and deep venous system and in
this way predict the results of superficial venous system surgery in
the cases that present damage to the superficial and deep systems. It
should be considered as a complementary quantitative test.15
The air plethysmography (APG) is a non-invasive method that quantifies
the variation of the volume of the leg as a result of the filling or
emptying of the veins due to a change of posture or exercise. For the
air plethysmography, a small sleeve is used to cover the entire extension
of the leg. The examination is interpreted on a graphic that registers
volume and time. The hemodynamic of the calf muscular pump is currently
being studied through the APG using the ejection fraction (EF) parameter
and the residual volume fraction (RVF). For the air plethysmography,
the most important parameter is the venous filling index, which is also
used to evaluated the results of surgical treatment.20
The incidence of ulceration is related to the EF and the venous filling
index (VFI). EF < than 40% and VFI between 5 and 2 ml/s correspond
to an ulceration index of 32%, whereas an EF between 40 and 60% and
a VFI with the same values corresponds to an ulceration index of 2%.21
The photoplethysmography was first used by Barnes in 1973. With specific
dorsiflexion maneuvers of the foot, the capillary network is emptied
and the photoplethysmography determines the time necessary for its refilling.
A value of less than 20 seconds is compatible with venous hypertension.
The degree of insufficiency is classified as: normal (> 20 seconds);
mild (15 to 20 seconds); moderate (5 to 15 seconds) and severe (>
5 seconds).2,14
The phlebography is indicated when the non-invasive methods described
above were not decisive enough to provide a clear diagnostic reading
and/or orientation of treatment in venous angiodysplasias and the possibility
of deep venous system surgery. The ascending phlebography defines the
obstruction with precision, while the descending phlebography identifies
areas of valvular incompetence. Arteriography is indicated in cases
where arteriovenous fistulas are suspected.8,15
If it is impossible to perform confirming examinations, clinical diagnosis
is sufficient for the initiation of clinical treatment.
TREATMENT
Isolated
symptoms that need treatment present clinical improvements with the
use of venoactive medicines and or elastic compression. The different
types of venoactive medicines have diverse effects on the varying symptoms.
Diosmin, calcium dobesilate, rutin, rutosides and Indian nut extract
provide objective reductions in the rates of edema, and can be used
as a complementary therapy.22 These drugs
should not substitute elastic compression treatment or the daily habits
that improve venous stasis, nor should they replace surgical therapy
when correctly indicated.15
Various studies have demonstrated the effective utilization of venoactive
drugs as an auxiliary treatment for CVI. Pittler and Ernst demonstrated
clinical improvements for CVI symptoms in patients that used a natural
product called Escin (horse-chestnut extract).23
Laurent et al. 24 performed a prospective,
double-blind study on 200 patients to evaluate the efficiency of micronized
diosmin. The improvement of the symptoms related to CVI was statistically
significant. Widmer 25 demonstrated a significant
improvement of edema and of the symptoms related to CVI in patients
that received calcium dobesilate in comparison to the control group.
Diuretics are rarely indicated. These drugs cause a rapid mobilization
of interstitial liquid to reduce the edema. However, this effect only
occurs in cases for which the drainage does not have any influence on
the cause of the edema. These drugs cause hemoconcentration and consequently
hypercoagulability, and they are contraindicated in cases of post-thrombotic
syndrome or lymphedema.17
In patients with eczema of the lower limbs that have an intense allergic
reaction, the use of topical corticosteroids is indicated.26
In the telangiectasias and reticular veins, the treatment of choice
is sclerotherapy, with the option of surgical treatment through mini-incisions
to remove the reticular veins. Its indication is principally esthetic,
and should be evaluated by comparing the improvements with the risks
associated with the procedure. The use of different types of lasers
has been proposed, however more studies are needed to demonstrate its
real effectiveness. The use of venoactive drugs and/or graduated elastic
compression stockings is indicated when associated symptoms are present.15
Surgery is indicated for the presence of reflux in the saphenous-femoral
or the saphenous popliteal junction, and given that these trunks do
not represent a channel of higher importance in venous emptying. Medicinal
methods of compression above 40 mmHg that are compatible with the diameters
and the anatomical formation of the leg and inelastic bandages are effective
in the postoperative phase and can provide a reduced incidence of relapse.
In patients with edema associated with varicose veins (CEAP3), graduated
elastic compression above 35 mmHg is effective. Elastic and inelastic
bandages can also be used provided they are properly applied.15
ELASTIC
COMPRESSION
Elastic
compression functions by decreasing the diameter of the vessel, pulling
together the leaflet of the valves, suppressing or reducing the reflux,
decreasing venous pressure, increasing the velocity of venous flow (resulting
in the decongestion of the tissues and the aspiration of the capillary
bed blood) and by providing the action of a venous pump. The increase
of fibrinolytic activity is debatable.17
The types of elastic compression are divided in four classes according
to the European and American classification (Table 1).17
Table
1- Classification of elastic compression
 |
| Classification
|
Indication |
 |
Class
I
|
|
| (light
compression- 18-25 mmHg / 15-21 mmHg) |
Indicated
for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis and for small varicose
veins with mild symptoms. |
Class
II
|
|
| (medium
compression - 26-34 mmHg / 23-32 mmHg) |
Indicated
for cases of moderate CVI, after surgical treatment of varicose
veins, thrombophlebitis, varicose ulcers and for the prevention
of deep venous thrombosis in high risk patients. |
Class
III
|
|
| (heavy
compression - 37-49 mmHg / 34-46 mmHg) |
Advanced
CVI with reversible edema |
Class
IV
|
|
| (very
heavy compression - >50 mmHg / >49 mmHg) |
Very
advanced CVI with irreversible edema. |
 |
Knee-high
stockings are sufficient for treatment. The elastic stockings higher
than the knee can obstruct knee flexion.8,26
In addition, some patients do not tolerate stockings that cover
the entire lower limb. Contraindications for the use of elastic stockings
are: the presence of chronic obstructive arterial disease of the lower
limbs, patients with decompensated cardiac insufficiency and in the
presence of abscesses, exudative dermatitis, ulcer of the lower limbs
and allergy to some component of the treatment.17
In the presence of trophic alterations, the use of elastic compression
stockings above 35 mmHg can be beneficial. Bandages that are correctly
applied can also act favorably.15
SURGICAL
TREATMENT
There is
still not sufficient evidence to demonstrate the value of surgical treatment.
However, the correction of superficial venous insufficiency with the
subsequent functional improvement can promote the improvement of trophic
alterations. Surgical reflux correction in the saphenous-femoral or
saphenous-popliteal junction can be beneficial, relieving the overload
of the deep venous system. The observation that the correction of superficial
reflux frequently corrected deep reflux suggests that deep reflux in
patients with primary superficial venous insufficiency could be do to
superficial reflux. Patients with edema and a past history of deep venous
thrombosis should be evaluated more rigorously before they are submitted
to surgical treatment.27
In patients with a healed ulcer, compression above 35 mmHg appears to
be effective in the prevention of varicose ulcer reoccurrence. Patients
that suffer from superficial venous insufficiency presented a healed
ulcer should be submitted to surgical treatment.
Patients that present isolated insufficiency of the perforating vein
connected to the ulcer should be submitted to ligature or the flow of
the perforating vein should be interrupted. The presence of incompetent
perforating veins in patients with advanced CVI (CEAP 4-6) and an inadequate
response to clinical therapy are indications for the interruption of
perforating veins.26 The identification
of the mechanisms involved in the appearance of incompetent perforating
veins is important, whether these be incidental, causative, or collateral
drainage channels. There are four types of perforating vein incompetence:
incompetent perforating veins responsible for reflux, leading to the
development of primary varicose veins in the superficial venous system;
perforating veins that act as a compensating mechanism through the collateral
veins to cause venous obstruction; perforating vein enlargement due
to superficial venous incompetence and congenital valvular deficiency
associated with a defect of the peripheral muscular pump.28
In 1988, Cockett 29 studied the indications
for perforating vein ligature. He divided patients into three groups.
The first group consisted of patients with superficial venous insufficiency,
with our without previous deep venous thrombosis. These patients benefited
from the removal of the insufficient veins and the ligature of the perforating
veins when necessary. The second group consisted of patients with a
previous history of deep venous thrombosis of the calf veins that currently
present perforating vein insufficiency but that display no evidence
of deep venous system obstruction or reflux. These patients benefit
from the ligature of incompetent perforating veins. The third group
consisted of patients with severe reflux of the deep venous system.
In this case, ligature surgery of the perforating veins was controversial.28,29
Linton initially proposed the subfascial ligature of the incompetent
perforating veins for the treatment of venous ulcers in the lower limbs.30
A surgical incision was made in the medial face of the leg allowing
for access to the perforating veins, including the locations below the
fascia of the deep posterior compartment. This surgery has some disadvantages,
such as: the complications of the postoperative wound and the need for
a longer hospital stay. There are some variations of this technique
that were developed to diminish the postoperative complications, such
as the use of small transversal or longitudinal incisions or the blind
divulsion of the perforating veins in the subfascial space.31
In 1976, Edwards descried the use of a phlebotomy introduced through
the subfascial channel, by means of an incision that was made immediately
below the knee and that continued until the level of the medial malleolus
to interrupt the perforating. This technique minimized the incision
and also made it in an area that was separated from the disease, even
though a blind entry was undertaken.31
In 1985, Hauer (Germany) described an endoscopic technique to visualize
and divide the incompetent perforating veins. His contribution gave
rise to Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery (SEPS).32
The endoscopic technique for perforating veins interruption presents
a lower number of complications from the wounds than the open technique
and constitutes the preferred methods for the ablation of medial perforating
veins. This procedure, accompanied by the ablation of the superficial
reflux, if present, effectively reduces the symptoms of CVI and induces
the rapid healing of the ulcers. The reoccurrence of ulcers after correction
of the perforating veins and of the superficial reflux in patients with
post-thrombotic syndrome is much higher than in those patients with
primary valvular incompetence. Despite the promising results, a prospective
randomized study is necessary to define the long-term benefits of the
interruption of incompetent perforating veins in all patients with advanced
disease and also to determine which patients with post-thrombotic syndrome
should be submitted to an interruption of the perforating veins.32
A clean, open ulcer in the granulation phase does not constitute a contraindication
for SEPS. The contraindications include associated chronic occlusive
arterial disease, an infected ulcer, morbid obesity and high-risk patients
or patients that are unable to walk. Diabetes, renal insufficiency or
ulcers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or scleroderma are relative
contraindications. Patients with previous interruption of the perforating
veins or those with extensive cutaneous alterations, large circumferential
ulcers or voluminous legs may not be eligible for the procedure. Those
with lateral ulcerations should be treated, if appropriate, for open
interruption of the lateral or posterior perforating veins.32
The surgical treatment of the deep venous system is reserved for patients
that suffer from a severe form of the disease, when conservative treatment
has not been effective. Candidate patients for the treatment generally
represent venous claudication (during walking, due to the increase in
venous pressure, the patient reports pain of the affected limb that
decreases slowly after a prolonged period of rest).33
The restoration of patency is a rare surgical indication and the presence
of iliac vein obstruction, through image examinations, does not constitute
an unique indication for surgical treatment. In the absence of claudication,
it is important that physiological studies are performed to confirm
whether the obstruction is hemodynamically significant, as when collateral
veins are well developed, the compensation is sufficient. This step
not only establishes the need for surgery, but also determines the probability
for therapeutic success.34
Among the surgical options for iliac vein obstruction are: crossed femorofemoral
derivations with the contra-lateral saphenous vein (Palma-Dale surgery)
or with the right femoroiliac vein with PTFE annular prosthesis.34
Initially described by Palma (Uruguay) and popularized by Dale in the
United States, the suprapubic crossed venous bypass is a useful venous
reconstruction technique for patients with proximal obstruction. This
surgery requires a normal iliofemoral contra-lateral venous system.
The results are improved when the affected limb does not experience
infrainguinal obstruction or incompetence of the deep venous system.
This surgery is especially indicated in young women with chronic iliac
vein occlusion followed by left iliofemoral venous thrombosis due to
the May-Thurner syndrome. The results vary between 63% and 89% in the
clinical improvement. The patency varies between 70% and 85%. Husni
et al., report improved results with the use of a temporary distal arterial-venous
fistula.35 Endovascular surgical techniques
through the use of thrombolysis, angioplasty and stent placement have
been recently utilized with solid short-term results.36
Femoral-popliteal derivation with the saphenous vein in situ
is used for obstructions of the superficial femoral vein.34
Once the flux obstruction of the exit can be treated through recanalization
of the obstructed venous segment or venous derivation, valvular incompetence
requires the creation of one or more functional valves to avoid reflux.
The restoration of valvular competence should be planned according to
the disease etiology. In primary valvular disease, with preserved anatomy
and significant hemodynamic reflux (at least level two in the Kistner
classification), valvuloplasty is indicated. The precise etiology of
this disturbance is unknown, however if the valvular cusp is redundant,
it can result in precarious coaptation and reflux. The Kistner valvuloplasty
technique uses the direct exposure of the redundant and refluent valvular
cusp to place sutures at the base of the cusp, which open the free edges
of the valve and makes it competent.33
The results are satisfactory with a 63% treatment success rate of the
ulcer after a period of seven years.37
In cases of valvular lesions, such as in postthrombotic syndrome for
example, transplants or valve transpositions are favored. In the selection
of patients it is important that reflux is present in the axial veins
and that it does not involve the collateral veins. Under this circumstance,
interposition of one competent valve can relieve the symptoms. A procedure
that is commonly used is the transposition of the axillary vein. The
duplex scan should be used to identify a segment of an axillary vein
with the right size and with a competent valvular segment. The basilic
vein becomes the axillary vein when it crosses the edge of the larger
pectoral muscle and can be an acceptable donation source. One of the
disadvantages of using the axillary vein is the high percentage of valves
that are incompetent. When transferred to the lower limb, they have
a propensity for dilation and reflux. A synthetic material covering
can by applied around the transferred valve in an attempt to reduce
the chances of this complication.33 The
results vary and some studies refer to success rates of between 80%
and 90% during four years of follow-up, while there are also success
rates of between 35% and 45%.37,38
ULCER
TREATMENT
Ulcer healing
occurs in three histologic stages, described as inflammatory, proliferative
and scar remodeling. The majority of lesions caused by wounds will close
in 30 days when they relate to etiopathogenesis and complications such
as simple compressive dressings, and provided they were treated with
careful hygiene. In some cases, despite these basic therapeutics, the
lesion may evolve chronically, sometimes dragging on for over a year.
The closed dressing maintains a humid environment, which avoids the
scab formation and increases the speed of epithelial cell migration,
of collagen synthesis and of the formation of granulation tissue and
angiogenesis. In addition, these dressings maintain a wound exudate
that is rich in growth factors that accelerate healing processes.14,39
Elastic and inelastic bandages are effective. In 1885, German dermatologist
Paul Unna introduced the use of a zinc oxide paste associated with elastic
compression for the treatment of varicose ulcers that is used even today.
The mechanism for action of Unna's boot is through elastic compression
that permits the patient to walk, similar to a topical action.40,41
Many dressings have been launched over recent years, including everything
from the modification of traditional dressings closed with Unna paste,
gauze and sponges and absorbents filled with medicine, to new products
with hydrochloride, alginate fiber agglomerates or activated carbon
base. In addition to maintaining the environment of the lesion, these
dressings control the moisture, absorb the excess secretion and avoid
the softening of the wound edges. Currently, there are the so-called
bioactive dressings, created through genetic engineering, that function
during on one or more phases of healing. Also in use are equivalents
of human flesh formed by a prosthetic bovine mold and filled with keratinocytes
and human fibroblasts.14,42
Pentoxifylline, a hemorrheologic agent, prevents the activation of the
leucocytes while liberating free radical, increasing the supply of oxygen
to the tissues. Colgan et al., performed a prospective double-blind
study on 80 patients with stasis ulcers. After months of treatment with
1200 mg/day of pentoxifylline, 23 of the 38 patients experienced the
complete healing of their ulcer. Of the patients that received the placebo,
only 12 of 42 experienced the healing of the ulcer. This difference
was statistically significant. This drug should be used as an auxiliary
treatment in association with elastic compression.42,43
In patients with an active ulcer, evidence of the medication's efficiency
is still limited. Bacteriologic analysis and the routine use of antibiotics
are not recommended as they do not influence the diagnosis, treatment
and prognosis. Antibiotics should only be used in cases of infections
with systemic manifestations. The value of using diverse types of local
treatment has not yet been proven, and the use of topical antibiotics
is contraindicated.15,39
Patients that suffer from active venous ulcers and reflux in saphenous-femoral
or saphenous- popliteal junction are benefited by surgical treatment.15
Although non-adhesion to clinical treatment is the most common cause
of ulcer healing, other causes should be excluded, principally arterial
insufficiency. Fungal and bacterial infections should be properly treatment,
and in some cases, a biopsy should be performed to exclude the possibility
of basal cell carcinoma or squamous.44
REFERENCES
1.
Maffei FHA. Insuficiência venosa crônica: diagnóstico
e tratamento clínico. In: Maffei FHA, Lastória S, Yoshida
WB. Doenças Vasculares Periféricas. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi;
1995. p. 1003-1011.
2. Porter JM, Moneta LG. Reporting standards in venous
disease: an update. J Vasc Surg 1995;21(4):635-45.
3. Brand FN, Dannenberg AL, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. The
epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham study. Am J Prev Med
1988;4:96-101.
4. Heit JA, Rooke TW, Silverstein MD, et al. Trends
in the incidence of venous stasis syndrome and venous ulcer: a 25-year
population-based study. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1022-27.
5. Maffei FHA, Magaldi C, Pinho SZ, et al. Varicose
veins and chronic venous insufficiency in Brazil: Prevalence among 1755
inhabitants of a country town. Int J Epidemiol 1986;15:210-7.
6. Silva MC. Chronic venous insufficiency of the lower
limbs and its socio-economic significance. Int Angiolol 1991;10(3):152-7.
7. Scott TE, LaMorte WW, Gorin DR, Menzoian JO. Risk
factors for chronic venous insufficiency: a dual case-control study.
J Vasc Surg 1995;22:622-8.
8. DePalma RG, Bergan JJ. Chronic venous insufficiency.
In: Dean RH, Yao JST, Brewster D. Current Diagnosis & Treatment
in Vascular Surgery. 1st ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1995.
p. 365-374.
9. Weingarten MS. State-of-the-art treatment of chronic
venous disease. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32(15):949-54.
10. Burnand KG, Whimster I, Naidoo A, Browse NL. Pericapillary
fibrin in the ulcer-bearing skin of the leg: The cause of lipodermatosclerosis
and venous ulceration. BMJ 1982;285:1071-2.
11. Herrick SE, Sloan P, McGurk M, Freak L, McCollum
CN, Ferguson MW.. Sequential changes in histologic pattern and extracellular
matrix deposition during the healing of chronic venous ulcers. Am J
Pathol 1992;285:1085-95.
12. Thomas PR, Nash GB, Dormandy JA. White cell accumulation
in dependent legs of patients with venous hypertension: a possible mechanism
for trophic changes in the skin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jun 18;296(6638):1693-5.
13. Dormandy JA. Pathophysiology of venous leg ulceration:
an update. Angiology 1997;48:71-5.
14. Muraco Neto B. Estase venosa e cardiopatia - uma
associação incômoda. Rev Soc Cardiol Estado de São
Paulo 1999;6:930-7.
15. Castro e Silva M, Cabral ALS, Barros N Jr, Castro
AA, Santos MERC. Normas de orientação clínica para
o diagnóstico e tratamento da insuficiência venosa crônica.
Belo Horizonte: Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
- SBACV; 2001.
16. Souza GG. Insuficiência venosa crônica.
In: Pereira AH. Manual de Cirurgia Vascular. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter;
1998. p. 227-233.
17. Ramelet AA, Monti M. Phlebology. The guide. Paris:
Elsevier; 1999.
18. Kistner RL, Eklof B, Masuda EM. Classification
of lower extremity venous disease. In: Yao JST, Pearce WH. Progress
in Vascular Surgery. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1997. p. 423-431.
19. Nicolaides AN, Hussein MK, Szendro G, Christopoulos
D, Vasdekis S, Clarke H.. The relation of venous ulceration with ambulatory
venous pressure measurements. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:414-19.
20. Owens LV, Farber MA, Young ML, et al. The value
of air plethysmography in predicting clinical outcome after surgical
treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:961-8.
21. Evangelista SSM. Pletismografia no estudo das doenças
venosas. In Maffei FHA, Lastória S, Yoshida WB, Rollo HA. Doenças
Vasculares Periféricas. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 2002.
22. Pittler MH, Ernst E. Horse chestnut seed extract
for chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD003230.
23. Mashour NH, Lin GI, Frishmann WH. Herbal medicine
for the treatment of cardiovascular disease: clinical consideration.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158(20):2225-34.
24. Laurent R, Gilly R, Frileux C. Clinical evaluation
of a venotropic drug in man. Example of Daflon 500 mg. Int Angiol 1988;7
Suppl 2:39-43.
25. Widmer L, Biland L, Barras JP. Doxium 500 in chronic
venous insufficiency: a double-blind placebo controlled multicentre
study. Int Angiol 1990;9:105-110.
26. Hallet JW Jr., Brewster DC, Rasmussen TE. Postphlebitic
syndrome and chronic venous insufficiency. In: Hallet JW Jr., Brewster
DC, Rasmussen TE. Handbook of Patient Care in Vascular Diseases. 4th
ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 269-76.
27. Labropoulos N, Tassiopoulos AK, Kang SS, Mansour
MA, Littooy FN, Baker WH.. Prevalence of deep venous reflux in patients
with primary superficial vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:663-8.
28. Saharay M, Scurr JH. Minimally invasive surgery
for perforator vein incompetence. Cardiovasc Surg 1996;4(6):701-5.
29. Cockett FB. Indications for and complications of
the ankle perforator exploration. Phlebology 1988;3:3-6.
30. Linton RR. The communicating veins of the lower
leg and the operative technique for their ligation. Ann Surg 1938;107:582-93.
31. Wilkinson GE, Maclaren IF. Long-term review of
procedures for venous perforator insufficiency. Surg Gynecol Obstet
1986;163:117-20.
32. Rhodes JM, Gloviczki P. Endoscopic perforating
vein surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1999;79(3):667-81.
33. Raju S. Surgical treatment of deep venous valvular
incompetence. In: Rutherford RB. Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia:
W. B. Saunders Co.; 2000. p. 2037-49.
34. Gloviczki P, Cho J. Surgical treatment of chronic
deep vein obstruction. In: Rutherford RB. Vascular Surgery. 5th ed.
Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 2000. p. 2049-2066.
35. Husni EA. Reconstruction of the veins: the need
for objectivity. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1983;24(5):525-8.
36. Neglen P, Berry MA, Raju S. Endovascular surgery
in the treatment of chronic primary and post-thrombotic iliac vein obstruction.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;20:560-71.
37. Raju S, Fredericks RK, Neglen PN, Bass JD.. Durability
of venous valve reconstruction techniques for "primary" and
postthrombotic reflux. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:357-67.
38. Bry JDL, Muto PA, O'Donnel TF, Isaacson LA. The
clinical and hemodynamic results after axillary-to-popliteal vein valve
transplantation. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:110-19.
39. Thomaz JB. Úlcera de estase venosa: concepção
etiopatogênica e terapêutica. In: Thomaz JB. Síndromes
Venosas. Diagnóstico e Tratamento. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter;
2001. p. 355-367.
40. Hendricks WM, Swallow RT. Management of stasis
venous ulcers with Unna's boots versus elastic support stockings. J
Am Acad Dermatol 1985;12(1 Pt 1):90-8.
41. Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA, Woodson J,
LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boot
versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management
of venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15(3):480-6.
42. Dormandy JA. Pharmacologic treatment of venous
leg ulcers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;25 Suppl 2:61-5
43. Colgan MP, Dormandy JA, Jones PW, Schraibman IG,
Shanik DG, Young RA. Oxpentifylline treatment of venous ulcers of the
leg. BMJ 1990;300:972-5.
44. Abou-Zamzam AM, Moneta GL. Deep vein insufficiency:
evaluation and conservative management. In: Cronenwett JL, Rutherford
RB. Decision Making in Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders
Co.; 2001. p. 294-297.
|