Giant superior mesenteric artery aneurysm associated with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm
(Portuguese PDF version)

Ricardo César Rocha Moreira1, Marcio Miyamotto2

1. PhD in Clinical Surgery, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Chief of Prof. Dr. Elias Abrão Division of Vascular Surgery, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
2. Vascular Surgeon, Prof. Dr. Elias Abrão Division of Vascular Surgery, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Correspondence:
Rua Pedro Muraro, 50/24
CEP 82030-620 - Curitiba - PR
Tel.: +55 (41) 244.8787
Fax: +55 (41) 335.3233
E-mail: ina@onda.com.br


ABSTRACT

The authors present a case of a patient with a giant atherosclerotic superior mesenteric artery aneurysm, associated with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Extensive investigation failed to demonstrate an embolic source or a connective tissue disease. The patient was successfully treated by open repair of both superior mesenteric artery and abdominal aortic aneurysms. The authors were unable to find in the literature a similar report of such a large superior mesenteric artery aneurysm, or such an association with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Key-words: superior mesenteric artery aneurysm, abdominal aortic aneurysm, mycotic aneurysm.
Palavras-chave: aneurisma, artéria mesentérica superior, aneurisma da aorta abdominal.

J Vasc Br 2003;2(3):227-29


Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) aneurysm is rare, being observed in one in every 12,000 autopsies.1 Only 5.5 to 8% of cases of visceral aneurysms and less than 0.5% of all intra-abdominal aneurysms are SMA aneurysms.2 The authors report a case of a 66-year-old patient with a giant atherosclerotic SMA aneurysm, associated with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. This association and the size of the SMA aneurysm have not been previously described in the literature.

CASE REPORT


A white, 66-year-old tradesman was referred to us by a general surgeon, who noted an abdominal murmur and a pulsatile mass in the right hypochondrium while examining an umbilical hernia. The patient had a history of cigarette smoking and drug-controlled hypertension. The physical examination was otherwise normal. Initial exams did not show active infectious or inflammatory processes. The abdominal echography revealed an intraperitoneal mass with thickened walls and liquid content. The computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed an SMA aneurysm measuring 11 cm in diameter, in addition to a fusiform infrarenal aortic aneurysm with a diameter of 6.0 cm (Figure 1). The arteriography confirmed the tomographic findings and showed an initially normal 3-cm long segment of the SMA and a patent inferior mesenteric artery (Figure 2). The patient was surgically treated through an extraperitoneal approach on the left side. The suprarenal aorta was initially approached with control of the proximal superior mesenteric and renal arteries. The SMA aneurysm was ligated proximally with later opening of the aneurysm sac and internal suture ligation of its branches. The AAA was corrected by the implantation of a 20-mm straight Dacron graft using the inclusion technique with reimplantation of the inferior mesenteric artery. After concluding the distal anastomosis of the aorta, a small opening was made on the peritoneal sac for inspection of the intestinal loops, which were pale and cyanotic. The evidence of acute intestinal ischemia, prompted the decision to perform SMA revascularization. A reverse greater saphenous vein graft, extending from the proximal stump of the SMA to the middle colic artery, was carried out (Figure 3). Ischemia was immediately reversed. The patient had transient diarrhea in the postoperative period. The diet was reintroduced on the fourth day. Bacterioscopy and the culture of aneurysm material yielded negative results. The patient was discharged from hospital after nine days.

click hereFigure 1- Abdominal CT-scan showing: a) SMA aneurysm and b) abdominal aortic aneurysm and SMA aneurysm.

click hereFigure 2- Arteriography: a) aortic aneurysm and SMA aneurysm, b) SMA aneurysm and c) abdominal aortic aneurysm.

click hereFigure 3- a) left extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta and origin of the SMA, the image of the left kidney was removed, b) after aneurysm correction (continuous arrow- saphenous vein graft between the stump of the SMA and the medial colic artery; dotted arrow- aorto-aortic graft coated with Dacron, with reimplantation of the inferior mesenteric artery).

DISCUSSION

The first surgical treatment of the SMA aneurysm was reported in 1953 by De Bakey & Cooley. The correction consisted of proximal and distal ligation with resection of the area affected by the aneurysm.3 Until 1997, more than 100 SMA aneurysms had been diagnosed and treated by way of several surgical techniques.4

Most SMA aneurysms are symptomatic. The most frequent symptom is moderate to severe abdominal pain, which increases gradually. Nausea, vomiting, jaundice, hemobilia and gastrointestinal bleeding may occur occasionally. A pulsatile mass is observed in over 50% of cases, and is distinguished from AA by palpation. The most dreaded complications are aneurysm rupture and thrombosis. In these cases, the distinction between the sudden increase of the aneurysm and angina or intestinal ischemia caused by aneurysmal thrombosis is extremely difficult.2,4,5

All diagnosed SMA aneurysms must be treated. Spontaneous rupture may occur in up to 50% of the cases. Intraoperative death rates amount to 30% when the patient is operated on in these conditions.4 The type of treatment depends mainly on the etiology of the aneurysm and on intestinal viability. According to the literature, until 1997, 35% of SMA aneurysms were treated by simple proximal and distal ligation, 35% by ligation and aneurysmectomy of the affected area and 21% by aneurysmorrhaphy only. Revascularization was necessary in 15% of the cases, due to intestinal ischemia.5

The simple ligation proximally and distally to the aneurysm with intraoperative assessment of intestinal viability is the treatment of choice, when there is no evidence of infection. Mycotic aneurysms should be treated by aneurysm resection, debridement of the infected area and with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Aneurysmorrhaphy can be used for saccular aneurysms and disease-free arteries, thus preserving the arterial lumen. However, this technique is seldom used.2,5

Revascularization is indicated if there is visceral ischemic involvement after arterial ligation. The use of prostheses is prohibited in the presence of infection. In these cases, we use saphenous vein interposition graft or a graft with the same material. Aorto-mesenteric bypasses are less frequently used.2,5-7

The presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm was taken into account for the selection of the surgical technique. The left extraperitoneal approach was chosen for offering good exposure of the proximal portion of the SMA, in addition to allowing for AAA correction. The restriction of this route on the inspection of the intestine after the ligation of the SMA was overcome with a small opening made anteriorly to the peritoneal sac. After the inspection, the opening was closed in order to protect the Dacron prosthesis from probable sources of infection due to bacterial translocation after transient ischemia. The high prevalence of mycotic aneurysm in this area rules out this hypothesis before and during surgery. This is the reason why the SMA aneurysm was approached first, as AAA correction routinely requires the use of a prosthesis. The lack of reliable methods for the intraoperative detection of intestinal ischemia after arterial ligation poses a major problem. The presence of a prosthesis in the aorta justifies routine mesenteric revascularization, thus eliminating the disastrous consequences arising from an intestinal ischemia, even if transient.

Although the size of the SMA aneurysm does not influence the selection of the surgical technique, its association with abdominal aortic aneurysm requires some care, especially with regard to infection. This association and the size (11 cm) of the true SMA aneurysm have never been reported in the literature.

REFERENCES

1. Ferrara BE. Mesenteric artery aneurysm. South Med J 1986;79:366-7.

2. Zenelock GB, Stanley JC. Splanchnic artery aneurysm. In: Rutherford RB, editor. Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000. p. 1369-1362.

3. Kopatsis A, D'Anna JA, Sithian N, Sabido F. Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm: 45 years later. Am Surg 1998;64:263-6.

4. Kanazawa S, Inada H, Murakami T, et al. The diagnosis and management of splanchnic artery aneurysm. Report of 8 cases. J Cardiovasc Surg 1997;38:479-85.

5. Messina LM, Shanley CJ. Visceral artery aneurysm. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:425-41.

6. Carr SC, Pearce WH, Volgelzang RL, McCarthy WJ, Nemeek AA, Yao JST. Current management of visceral artery aneurysm. Surgery 1996;120:627-33.

7. Ishii A, Nanimoto T, Morishita S, et al. Embolization for rupture superior mesenteric artery aneurysms. Br J Radiol 1996;69(820):296-300.


J Vasc Br - Official Publication of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery